Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly become one of the most important and transformative technologies of our time, with applications in virtually every field and industry. Among these applications, academic writing is one of the areas that has experienced perhaps the most rapid development and uptake of AI-based tools and methodologies. We argue that use of AI-based tools for scientific writing should widely be adopted.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing can be divided into two broad categories: those that assist authors in the writing process; and those that are used to evaluate and assess the quality and validity of written work. Tools such as natural language processing that can understand and generate human-like language can assist authors in writing and preparing manuscripts (Box 1). Tools such as plagiarism detection software and automated peer-review platforms can assist reviewers and editors in evaluating the quality of the manuscript. Furthermore, automated peer-review platforms can quickly and objectively evaluate large numbers of manuscripts, potentially reducing their workload1.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
How artificial intelligence will affect the future of medical publishing
- Jean-Louis Vincent
Critical Care Open Access 06 July 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 /30days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Checco, A., Bracciale, L., Loreti, P., Pinfield, S. & Bianchi, G. AI-assisted peer review. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8, 25 (2021).
Hutson, M. Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature 611, 192–193 (2022).
Krzastek, S. C., Farhi, J., Gray, M. & Smith, R. P. Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential. Transl Androl. Urol. 9, 2797–2813 (2020).
Khullar, D. Social media and medical misinformation: confronting new variants of an old problem. JAMA 328, 1393–1394 (2022).
Reddy, R. V. et al. Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction. Andrologia 54, e14607 (2022).
Khodamoradi, K., Golan, R., Dullea, A. & Ramasamy, R. Exosomes as potential biomarkers for erectile dysfunction, varicocele, and testicular injury. Sex. Med. Rev. 10, 311–322 (2022).
Stone, L. You’ve got a friend online. Nat. Rev. Urol. 17, 320 (2020).
Pai, R. K. et al. A review of current advancements and limitations of artificial intelligence in genitourinary cancers. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 8, 152–162 (2020).
You, J. B. et al. Machine learning for sperm selection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 387–403 (2021).
Stone, L. The dawning of the age of artificial intelligence in urology. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 322 (2021).
Acknowledgements
The manuscript was edited for grammar and structure using the advanced language model ChatGPT. The authors thank S. Verma for addressing inquiries related to artificial intelligence.
Author information
Author notes
These authors contributed equally: Roei Golan, Rohit Reddy.
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Clinical Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Roei Golan
Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
Rohit Reddy,Akhil Muthigi&Ranjith Ramasamy
Authors
- Roei Golan
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rohit Reddy
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akhil Muthigi
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ranjith Ramasamy
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Ranjith Ramasamy.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
R.R. is funded by the National Institutes of Health Grant R01 DK130991 and the Clinician Scientist Development Grant from the American Cancer Society. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Related links
ChatGPT: https://chat.openai.com/
Cohere: https://cohere.ai/
CoSchedule Headline Analyzer: https://coschedule.com/headline-analyzer
DALL-E 2: https://openai.com/dall-e-2/
Elicit: https://elicit.org/
Penelope.ai: https://www.penelope.ai/
Quillbot: https://quillbot.com/
Semantic Scholar: https://www.semanticscholar.org/
Wordtune by AI21 Labs: https://www.wordtune.com/
Writefull: https://www.writefull.com/
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Golan, R., Reddy, R., Muthigi, A. et al. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nat Rev Urol 20, 327–328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
This article is cited by
-
How artificial intelligence will affect the future of medical publishing
- Jean-Louis Vincent
Critical Care (2023)